Liquor Before Beer, NOT in the Clear?
We never put a lot of thought into the reasoning behind the old "liquor before beer..." saying, but apparently that doesn't matter because it isn't true anyway. What does that mean for our other sayings? Does a stitch in time not really save nine? Will or will not an apple a day keep the doctor away? Are a fool and his money soon parted? It's making our collective heads hurt enough that we need a drink to settle our nerves. The only question is whether we should start with liquor or beer?
Is the saying "Beer before liquor, never sicker, liquor before beer, never fear" physiologically accurate?
Santa Barbara, California
No. Portland's Willamette Week interviewed a nutrition expert and a pharmacologist; both nixed the theory. They astutely note that mixing different types of alcohol is generally a bad idea.
The reasoning behind the proverb is that it's easier on your body to absorb weaker alcoholic drinks, like beer, later in the evening. This probably holds some merit. It's also true that your body tends to process alcohol from carbonated drinks faster. But any piece of advice regarding alcohol consumption that contains the line "never fear" is obviously pretty suspect.
Read more via Ask Yahoo!
Read More in: Liquor News
Share this Article with others:
Came straight to this page? Visit Liquor Snob for all the latest news.
Posted by Jake at February 7, 2006 12:52 PM
Correct me if I am wrong, but I always thought it meant that if you got drunk on beer and then decided to start doing shots, you were screwed. But if you start with liqour and then switch to beer when you have no sense of volume control, you are much better off.